Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Nyuuz
Jinaral kantent
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
AFM opposed UMG's and Warner's AI licensing dismissal bids
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Bombastus, post: 91661, member: 2178"] The American Federation of Musicians wants UMG, Warner Records, and Atlantic kept in court over AI licensing. The union says member performances entered commercial AI systems without musician pay or credit, while the labels argue their labor contract creates no payment rate for AI use. Article 21(a) sits at the center of the fight. AFM says the clause can reasonably cover new recording uses and carries payment and notice duties. UMG reads it differently, claiming another union agreement must supply a rate, yet no separate AI deal exists. Basically, both sides see a different contract. AFM also points to sampling terms, earlier label copyright arguments against Suno and Udio, and Udio’s planned Starstruck modes as support. Judge Edgardo Ramos has questioned why musicians should miss payment if labels benefit from AI licenses. Sony Music is outside the case, while AI remains part of ongoing SRLA bargaining. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
AFM opposed UMG's and Warner's AI licensing dismissal bids
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top