Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nalij
Jinaral Q and A
AI art controversy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Vincent Bisset de Gramont, post: 17926"] You clearly don't understand how [URL='https://business.goldmidi.com/machine-learning/']machine learning[/URL] actually works. None of the works were copied; they were analyzed. It's the equivalent of looking at a ton of artwork and remembering general details about how it looked. Copyright is an exclusive right over distribution only. I can look at a movie and draw art based on poses and elements I saw generally without infringing on anyone's copyright. Likewise, so can machine learning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nalij
Jinaral Q and A
AI art controversy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top