Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Di myuuzik indoschri
Sangraitin an injinierin
Automated vs. human audio mastering?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Munyaradzi Mafaro, post: 15832, member: 636"] Audio mastering in modern times has been watered down to two things and these are: [LIST] [*]Brighter is ALWAYS better. [*]Louder is ALWAYS better. [/LIST] And with that type of mindset, the moral of the story is ML (i.e. machine learning) can go beyond human intelligence and can be taught to do this efficiently hence automated mastering will assure consistency and reproducibility as the algorithms become more and more advanced. Eventually, mastering engineers will be put out of business by such services followed by mixing engineers (i.e. automated audio mixing with minimal or no human involvement at all), and of course, machine learning will come for music producers, songwriters then as the final nail on the coffin it will come for record label employees. When it's all said and done it's the investors who stand to benefit a LOT, I mean a LOT than any other period in music business history. Why? Because human beings are so expensive and less productive—you can't in most places legally get them to grind 100 hours a week (even if you allow them to piss in bottles) compared to a machine/program that doesn't need to take breaks or ask to go on holidays neither does it expect a bonus and all the other work-related benefits! All it needs are regularly scheduled updates—nothing more and nothing less. [I]N.B. companies don't exist primarily for the purpose of providing jobs. Their purpose is to provide a free market with a product or service. In other words, jobs help them reach their goals although this isn't a priority.[/I] I guess this is arguably why some billionaires constantly advocate for population control—they sure know what's coming (i.e. perhaps 500 million people on earth) since if current jobs/careers become widely automated what then will happen to billions of people except chaos and unending daily protests? In other words, I suppose to them a reduction of population is much more manageable on universal basic income than billions of people doing nothing but bonking each other every week whilst popping more babies year after year. The offspring won't find work when they become adults, still. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Di myuuzik indoschri
Sangraitin an injinierin
Automated vs. human audio mastering?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top