Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Tanonoka, post: 15838, member: 2313"]
[USER=27]@Queen[/USER] you have already answered your second question because that's exactly what happens when you upload an already mastered song.

Most algorithm-based audio mastering services as we speak are meant for stuff that's hasn't yet been mastered (or content without too much stereo bus processing) otherwise the results will sound worse than a bedroom music producer fooling around with iZotope Ozone, Brainworx bx_masterdesk, or IK Multimedia Lurssen Mastering Console. Hence, there are NOT that "intelligent" as they are marketed in the press.

I'd suggest that at least these services should check the average or integrated LUFS/LKFS of the program material. If the integrated LUFS/LKFS is between -8 to -10 LUFS/LKFS obviously it means someone intentionally slammed a mix into a brickwall limiter so there's no point in doing anything to that except to recommend that they should re-upload an unmastered version of the same mix.

Finally to answer your first question, no, most of these robot mastering services currently aren't meant to give you further feedback about your mix neither what they did to make it sound better. They are simply meant to process audio based on whatever proprietary algorithm the platform thinks is suitable to implement for a given style of music.
[/QUOTE]

Name