Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Drake vs. Universal Music Group
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Nehanda, post: 29493, member: 2262"] In early 2025, superstar rapper Drake took the surprising step of suing Universal Music Group (UMG), the major label responsible for releasing much of his music. Drake claims UMG damaged his reputation by promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which he says falsely dangerously portrayed him. Drake specifically accused UMG of defamation and harassment because the song suggested he engaged in inappropriate behavior. He claims this portrayal endangered him and his family, causing security issues like break-ins and threats at his home. [HEADING=2]The Diss Track That Triggered the Suit[/HEADING] In May 2024, Kendrick Lamar dropped "Not Like Us," directly targeting Drake. The track accused Drake of highly inappropriate actions, causing outrage and sparking debates online. Drake's lawsuit argues that the accusations went beyond typical rap rivalry, crossing into harmful, real-world consequences. Drake believes UMG intentionally promoted these damaging lyrics to generate controversy, putting profits above artist safety. [HEADING=2]Why Drake is Blaming UMG Instead of Kendrick[/HEADING] Drake chose to sue UMG instead of Kendrick Lamar because UMG controls the distribution and promotion of Kendrick's music. He alleges that UMG amplified and encouraged the spread of false and harmful claims, turning them into a viral phenomenon. Drake sees UMG's promotional efforts as a betrayal, especially since he's been signed to labels under UMG's umbrella for years. UMG responded by defending Kendrick's lyrics as typical rap hyperbole, insisting the song was clearly meant as exaggerated entertainment, not factual accusation. [HEADING=2]The Drake-Kendrick Feud Explained[/HEADING] The legal battle has roots in a decade-long rivalry between Drake and Kendrick Lamar. Initially friendly collaborators in the early 2010s, tensions first emerged in 2013 when Kendrick challenged Drake and other rappers in his famous "Control" verse. Over the years, both artists traded subtle and overt insults in their songs, deepening their competitive rivalry. By 2024, the rivalry escalated dramatically, with songs explicitly attacking each other's personal lives. This ultimately led Kendrick to release "Not Like Us," which went viral and led to the current lawsuit. [HEADING=2]Why Kendrick Lamar and Drake Are Rivals[/HEADING] Initially, allies, Kendrick and Drake became rivals largely because both rappers were competing for the unofficial title of hip-hop's best. Kendrick's aggressive verses and claims of superiority directly challenged Drake's position. Drake responded similarly. Both artists engaged in lyrical battles, each trying to outdo the other. This rivalry reached new heights when Kendrick dismissed the idea that Drake belonged alongside him as one of rap's "Big Three," setting off a fresh wave of confrontational tracks. [HEADING=2]How Fans and the Public Reacted[/HEADING] Fans closely followed every development in the feud, dividing into camps supporting either Drake or Kendrick. The release of "Not Like Us" became a cultural moment, celebrated by Kendrick's fans but strongly criticized by Drake's supporters as crossing a serious line. [HEADING=2]Why This Lawsuit Matters Beyond Drake and Kendrick[/HEADING] Drake's lawsuit has broader implications, raising questions about artistic freedom, defamation, and responsibility. UMG argues that taking lyrical insults literally could threaten rap's creative freedom, while Drake counters that some accusations have dangerous real-world consequences. If Drake wins, it could set new standards for how record labels handle controversial content. If he loses, it could affirm the artistic license rappers currently have in diss tracks, even at the risk of reputational harm. [HEADING=2]The Current State of the Legal Battle[/HEADING] As of early 2025, UMG has asked the court to dismiss Drake's lawsuit, insisting it lacks legal merit. They argue Kendrick's lyrics were protected speech, clearly artistic exaggeration, not literal accusations. Drake remains determined to proceed, aiming to hold UMG accountable for the negative consequences he's faced since the song's release. The legal fight continues, watched closely by the music industry and fans alike, with potential outcomes that could shape the future of rap rivalries and artistic expression. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Drake vs. Universal Music Group
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top