Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Queen, post: 86747, member: 27"] A revived parliamentary weapon just dragged a decades-old expulsion saga back into today’s Lok Sabha brawl. Dubey revives 1978 playbook [LIST] [*]BJP MP Nishikant Dubey pushed a substantive motion against Rahul Gandhi. [*]Dubey linked it to Indira Gandhi’s 1978 ouster. [*]His X post shared old parliamentary extracts. [*]Motion seeks cancellation of Gandhi’s Lok Sabha seat. [/LIST] What a substantive motion does [LIST] [*]BJP MP Nishikant Dubey filed a standalone House proposal. [*]Such a motion forces debate and a formal vote. [*]Once admitted, the House must decide yes or no. [*]Outcome can signal the House’s clear opinion. [/LIST] Indira Gandhi’s 1978 fallout [LIST] [*]Prime Minister Indira Gandhi faced a motion after a Privileges Committee report. [*]Findings accused her of targeting officials during the Emergency. [*]Morarji Desai’s resolution passed on December 19, 1978. [*]Tihar Jail held her for the rest of the session. [/LIST] Return and reversal [LIST] [*]Indira Gandhi later regained power in the 7th Lok Sabha. [*]On May 7, 1981, the earlier expulsion was scrapped. [*]Her disqualification did not stay permanent. [*]That chapter still fuels today’s comparisons. [/LIST] Trade deal clash sparks action [LIST] [*]Rahul Gandhi blasted the India-US trade deal in Lthe ok Sabha. [*]Treasury bench members protested his remarks loudly. [*]BJP MPs accused Gandhi of misleading the House. [*]The Congress party insisted no parliamentary rule was broken. [/LIST] Government steps back [LIST] [*]Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju addressed the fallout. [*]Rijiju said the government paused its own proposal. [*]Since Dubey already filed one, the Centre deferred. [*]That pause leaves the private motion in play. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Name