Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Geza flips 2030 plans, leaving Mnangagwa in a bind
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Nehanda, post: 30488, member: 2262"] Geza changed everything when he spoke up. He made Mnangagwa worry about keeping his job right here and right today instead of dreaming about staying until 2030. The president must fight to finish his current term rather than plan for extra years beyond what the law allows. People like Tino Machakaire, who push for extending Mnangagwa's presidency until 2030, face danger. They anger regular citizens and create enemies among party members and government officials. The risk grows every day they continue this campaign. Mnangagwa should clearly announce that he rejects any term extension past 2028. He needs to take charge of ZANU-PF again and shut down all groups promoting the 2030 agenda. This would help heal divisions inside the party and create a clear path for someone new to take leadership. He could leave behind a positive legacy by ensuring a peaceful transfer of power—something Zimbabwe has never seen since independence. This approach would protect his family wealth just as the Mugabe family kept their riches after Robert lost power. Unless Mnangagwa committed major corruption, the next ZANU-PF leader would likely respect his family assets. The recent protests show that Zimbabweans want stronger leadership from opposition figures. Nelson Chamisa plays it safe with peaceful politics that often leads nowhere. His approach fails to energize people when they need real action. Citizens proved they could send powerful messages without confronting soldiers directly. Chamisa could organize nationwide shutdowns to pressure the government without putting protesters in physical danger. This strategy avoids bloodshed but still creates meaningful resistance. People want more from their leaders than Bible verses and pretty speeches. As Chamisa prepares to return to public life, he faces higher expectations. The public demands concrete plans instead of inspirational words. Despite these challenges, Chamisa remains the person most capable of uniting regular citizens to stand up for their rights and create real change in Zimbabwe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Geza flips 2030 plans, leaving Mnangagwa in a bind
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top