Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Misc
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Google blocks critic Nate Jhake after AI try-on feature draws privacy backlash
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Munyaradzi Mafaro, post: 55805, member: 636"] Google faced criticism after launching an artificial intelligence feature that allows users to upload dressing room photographs for virtual clothing trials. Tech commentator Nate Jhake questioned the privacy implications of this technology. Executive Rajan Patel promoted the feature while referencing a controversial advertisement featuring Sydney Sweeney for a teen clothing brand. Jhake asked whether Google trained its AI models using customer-uploaded images. Patel declined to address these data collection concerns. Jhake subsequently posted viral commentary suggesting Google pursued AI-driven parasocial products rather than simple shopping assistance. He referenced Google's investment in Character.AI, which creates conversational chatbots designed to simulate human relationships. The post attracted approximately 100,000 views from users who supported Jhake's criticism. Patel responded by blocking Jhake rather than engaging with the substantive concerns raised. This incident highlights broader questions about technology companies rushing AI products to market without adequate consideration of ethical implications. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Google blocks critic Nate Jhake after AI try-on feature draws privacy backlash
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top