Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Misc
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Google pushes fair use for AI training dispute
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Queen, post: 89477, member: 27"] A new policy paper argues AI training on public web data should stay legal under fair use, stirring fresh pushback from the music industry. Google's fair use argument [LIST] [*]The paper says training models on public data counts as transformative use. [*]It compares the practice to an art student learning from a gallery. [*]Copyright concerns should focus on outputs, not on training inputs. [*]Kent Walker published the 21-page paper on Thursday, June 25. [/LIST] Data control and payments [LIST] [*]Google offers machine-readable tags letting sites block AI training. [*]The company says it is exploring new partnerships and value-exchange models. [*]Google has paid for access to specialized, non-public content. [/LIST] Enforcement stance [LIST] [*]Google wants enforcement to target copied outputs, not training methods. [*]It opposes automated filters that judge content as too similar. [*]The company favors standard notice-and-takedown systems for infringement. [*]Google backs the NO FAKES Act, which protects voices and likenesses. [/LIST] Music industry lawsuits [LIST] [*]The RIAA sued Suno and Udio for mass copyright infringement in 2024. [*]Udio later signed licensing deals with Universal, Warner, Merlin, and Kobalt. [*]Sony Music's case against Udio remains active in court. [*]Music publishers sued Anthropic over Claude's use of song lyrics. [/LIST] Anthropic lawsuit and licensing deals [LIST] [*]Publishers filed a bigger suit, seeking over $3 billion in damages. [*]The RIAA and NMPA urged courts to reject Anthropic's fair-use defense. [*]NMPA struck an industry-wide licensing deal with Udio in June. [*]David Israelite called it the first deal with a major AI music company. [/LIST] Google's own copyright fight [LIST] [*]Independent artists sued Google in March over its Lyria 3 model. [*]They allege Google used YouTube recordings without permission for training. [*]Google says artists licensed their music through YouTube's terms of service. [/LIST] FARO regulatory proposal [LIST] [*]Google proposes an industry-funded body called FARO to police frontier models. [*]The group would set safety standards and verify audits for developers. [*]Google compares the idea to regulators like FINRA and NERC. [*]Every day AI uses should follow existing laws, the paper argues. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nyuuz
Google pushes fair use for AI training dispute
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top