Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Queen, post: 85053, member: 27"] Intel is quietly hyping its foundry comeback, hinting at billions on the line while it waits for customers to blink first. What Intel wanted everyone to hear [LIST] [*]Intel used its Q4 earnings call to change the tone [*]Client and data center chatter felt uneven [*]Foundry talk, though, sounded way more confident [*]Leadership kept stressing momentum instead of excuses [/LIST] Why Intel Foundry suddenly sounds alive [LIST] [*]CEO Lip-Bu Tan spent real time on process updates [*]Intel 18A is already shipping in actual products [*]Yield improvements are happening steadily, not hypothetically [*]Customer demand is strong enough to justify ramp pressure [/LIST] 18A-P is where things get interesting [LIST] [*]Intel is now delivering PDK 1.0 for 18A-P [*]Both internal and external customers are already engaged [*]Sampling is no longer theoretical [*]Intel is pitching this node as production-ready, not a science project [/LIST] Why TSMC keeps coming up [LIST] [*]18A-P is being framed as an alternative to TSMC N3 [*]N3 supply is tight, and everyone knows it [*]That shortage makes Intel suddenly look useful [*]The competitive window is wide open if Intel executes [/LIST] Apple is quietly hovering in the background [LIST] [*]Apple is reportedly involved in sampling [*]No public commitment yet [*]Still, Intel keeps name-dropping engagement signals [*]The implication is credibility, not confirmation [/LIST] The real bottleneck is money [LIST] [*]Intel Foundry is burning CapEX on R&D and fabs [*]The industry worry is scale, not tech [*]Even if the nodes work, can Intel afford volume ramps [*]That question keeps hanging in the air [/LIST] Why Intel is not rushing 14A [LIST] [*]CFO David Zinsner made this part clear [*]Intel will not spend big on 14A capacity without customers locked in [*]R&D continues, but fab expansion waits [*]Capacity only unlocks once contracts exist [/LIST] When 14A commitments might land [LIST] [*]Intel expects customer decisions late this year or early next year [*]Visibility improves first, spending follows later [*]Customers are currently sampling 14A at the 0.5 PDK stage [*]The back half of the timeline matters most [/LIST] Realistic 14A timing [LIST] [*]Risk production is targeted for late 2027 [*]Full volume production lines up around 2028 [*]That schedule matches the leading foundries [*]Intel is clearly trying to look disciplined, not desperate [/LIST] Advanced packaging is the sleeper hit [LIST] [*]Packaging is where Intel sounds genuinely bullish [*]EMIB and Foveros keep getting highlighted [*]Few foundries can offer competitive alternatives here [*]HPC customers are paying attention [/LIST] Customers are already paying up [LIST] [*]Zinsner says some customers are prepaying [*]EMIB and EMIB-T capacity is tight across the industry [*]Prepayment signals real commitment, not window shopping [*]That kind of demand is rare right now [/LIST] Why this matters financially [LIST] [*]Advanced packaging commitments are expected to exceed $1 billion [*]EMIB could show up in mainstream products by 2026 [*]That revenue helps offset foundry operating losses [*]Break-even suddenly feels less fictional [/LIST] The bigger picture Intel is selling [LIST] [*]Frontend and backend under one roof is the pitch [*]Few companies can offer both at scale [*]Intel Foundry wants to be that one-stop shop [*]The company believes the pieces are finally lining up [/LIST] Where this leaves Intel [LIST] [*]Foundry progress looks real, not just talk [*]Capital discipline is slowing things down on purpose [*]Packaging may drive revenue faster than nodes [*]Intel is betting customers commit before the spending floodgates open [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Name