Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Queen, post: 85782, member: 27"] Jayaram got pulled into the Sabarimala gold mess as a witness, confirming the plates left Kerala while dodging any accusation of personal gain. Why investigators questioned him [LIST] [*]Jayaram was questioned by the SIT at his Chennai residence. [*]Probe focused on missing gold plates linked to Sabarimala. [*]Investigators called the step key to tracking diversion. [*]Outcome framed him as a witness, not a suspect. [/LIST] What he admitted [LIST] [*]Jayaram confirmed the gold plates reached his Chennai home. [*]Plates were meant to stay at the Sannidhanam. [*]Statement backed claims of transport outside Kerala. [*]Movement strengthened the prosecution's narrative. [/LIST] No legal heat on the actor [LIST] [*]SIT stated no action planned against Jayaram. [*]Found zero financial links to the accused individuals. [*]Ruled out money trails or personal benefit. [*]Classified his role as non-commercial. [/LIST] Connection to the main accused [LIST] [*]Jayaram acknowledged knowing Unnikrishnan Potti for decades. [*]Relationship rooted in shared Sabarimala faith. [*]Visits to the shrine spanned nearly five decades. [*]Trust stemmed from religious familiarity. [/LIST] Religious reasoning behind actions [LIST] [*]Jayaram said Potti framed rituals as spiritually beneficial. [*]Believed poojas on the plates would bring merit. [*]Agreed based on faith, not logistics. [*]Denied awareness of misuse or fraud. [/LIST] Why his testimony matters [LIST] [*]Jayaram agreed to depose before the court. [*]SIT sees value in mapping plate movement. [*]Public rituals outside the temple became central. [*]Case leans on his confirmation trail. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Name