Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Munyaradzi Mafaro, post: 82471, member: 636"]
Someone finally said the quiet part out loud about fixing broken streaming payouts. Music strategist Joel Gouveia argues Spotify should completely stop paying artists with fewer than 250,000 monthly listeners to funnel that cash toward professional musicians who are starving under the current dilution.

He calculates that cutting off the long tail of hobbyists would bump per-stream rates significantly. This math suggests a mid-tier act could see their monthly check jump from rent money to an actual salary, transforming the platform from a tip jar into a career sustainer.

This spicy proposal lands right as Spotify did the exact opposite for video podcasters. The company just slashed eligibility rules to let talkers monetize with way less engagement, creating a massive double standard where musicians face huge barriers while vloggers get an easy pass.

Gouveia defends his stance, citing YouTube and TikTok, noting they already block monetization until creators prove real demand. He insists the current system hands out useless pocket change to amateurs while draining the pool for artists trying to make a living wage.

Universal Music Group and Deezer already tested similar waters with their artist-centric model, though their bar sits much lower. Critics at Believe hate these gatekeeping ideas because they allegedly rob up-and-comers to pay the rich, but Gouveia claims the industry needs sustainability more than participation.
[/QUOTE]

Name