Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Scorpio, post: 15786, member: 4"] Q 0.349672 works tremendously well for boosts when applied to Bark 17, 21, 23 (i.e. what some folks consider to be EQ pressure points). It can also be used at 24 kHz or even 28 kHz to add top-end sheen where necessary. In fact, most analog EQs if not more than 50% of them have that type of broadness in relation to the EQ curves. Q 0.707 is less likely to create a mess to either Bark 1 or Bark 2 even though it's slightly wider for that range—obviously, it depends on the genre. In summary, Q 0.71 is a better recommendation than Q 0.349672 especially when someone asks a question about a general-purpose EQ curve without the need to expagorate things tew much. Otherwise, we will be here until the cows come home. [/QUOTE]