Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Nyuuz
Jinaral kantent
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nalij
Jinaral Q and A
What's the actual difference between Freemasons and regular fraternities anyway?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Ghost91, post: 94008"] Think of Freemasonry as a brotherhood built around initiation ceremonies and traditions, rather than your typical social club. The big principles are brotherly love, helping others, and truth, alongside faith, hope, charity, and treating people equally. Members progress through three degrees: Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, and Master Mason. Each ceremony works almost like a little stage production, using a fictional narrative surrounding King Solomon's Temple being built to get moral lessons across. Along the way, members promise not to disclose much of what happens, including particular signs, handshakes, and passwords. Funny thing is, you can Google most of that stuff in half a minute. Keeping people genuinely clueless isn't really the idea. What's being tested is whether somebody keeps their word, even when everybody else has already spilled the beans. And yes, you'll hear endless conspiracy stories about Masons. Quite a few trace back to Leo Taxil's infamous hoax, which was essentially him winding up the Catholic Church until it lost its collective mind. Another source of controversy is religion. Masonry asks members to believe in a deity without insisting on one particular religion. Some faith groups dislike that approach, especially when they insist theirs takes precedence, and certain interpretations or writings end up producing accusations of Satanism. Then you've got related groups you can join separately, known as appendant bodies. The Scottish Rite, York Rite, and Shriners are examples, with their own ceremonies and particular interests. As for the supposedly exclusive membership, money and social rank aren't really the intended criteria. Personal character is what matters. There's an old saying that any man could become a Mason, but that doesn't mean every man will. Back in the day, your town's influential people probably belonged to the lodge. Nowadays you'll find ordinary guys from just about every background. If a few hundred dollars annually covers your dues, occasional meals, and some charitable donations, the financial side shouldn't stop you. The point is improving men who already have decent character, not magically transforming bad people into good ones. It's also one of the oldest examples of a place for men to socialize outside work and home. Women's and mixed-gender branches exist too, although they're uncommon and generally aren't recognized as regular Masonic lodges. That distinction matters when people casually lump every related organization together anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Home
Forums
Labrish
Nalij
Jinaral Q and A
What's the actual difference between Freemasons and regular fraternities anyway?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top