A chunk of South Africa's VAT Act just got torched by the Western Cape High Court for handing tax powers to the wrong branch of government.
Court guts executive tax authority
Court guts executive tax authority
- Judge Matthew Francis ruled the delegation unconstitutional.
- Parliament alone holds power over national tax rates.
- Francis dismissed regulatory-purpose arguments as flimsy.
- Lawmakers got 24 months to patch the legal defect.
- Helen Zille called it a win for parliamentary oversight.
- Her party filed the challenge back in April last year.
- Zille framed it as classic no-taxation-without-representation stuff.
- Future VAT changes must go through proper legislative channels.
- Enoch Godongwana announced a VAT hike starting 1 May.
- Parliament passed fiscal proposals despite pushback from the DA.
- Godongwana and SARS Commissioner Edward Kieswetter fought the case.
- Their defense painted the power as fiscal management, not taxation.
- Setting a tax rate is no minor detail, per Francis.
- His ruling called it a revenue-raising mechanism, full stop.
- The Constitutional Court still needs to confirm the invalidation.
- The current VAT rate stays until parliament rewrites the law.
- Sinawo Thambo said the ruling backed their long-held stance.
- EFF had mounted its separate court challenge on the hike.
- Their argument mirrored the no-representation, no-taxation principle.
- The party pushed the same line in committee and in court.