The CBI's refusal to accept a sweeping discharge order is dragging the Delhi excise policy case straight back into the courts next week.
CBI's challenge at the Delhi High Court
CBI's challenge at the Delhi High Court
- The CBI filed a criminal revision petition against the Rouse Avenue Court's discharge order.
- Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and 21 others were all let off by the trial court.
- Justice Swarnakanta Sharma's single-judge bench is scheduled to hear it on March 9.
- The agency is essentially arguing that the trial court got it completely wrong.
- Special Judge Jitendra Singh's order ran over 1,100 paragraphs and torched the CBI's case.
- Nearly 300 prosecution witnesses and voluminous records still produced zero actionable material.
- Forcing the accused to stand trial without admissible evidence was called a manifest miscarriage of justice.
- The court rejected the CBI's overarching-conspiracy theory and said the excise policy followed proper procedure.
- Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 was allegedly tailored to benefit private liquor entities like the South Group.
- Upfront bribes allegedly routed for electoral purposes were at the heart of the CBI's case.
- The policy was eventually scrapped amid corruption allegations by the then AAP-led government.
- Manoj Tiwari warned that AAP's post-discharge celebrations could be cut short by the High Court.
- Destroyed SIM cards and mobile phones were flagged by Tiwari as deeply suspicious.
- BJP has committed to pursuing accountability at both political and legal levels until the end.