Congo mineral deal is a risky bet for US security

The Congo has asked the Trump team for a big trade deal. They want US troops to help them with security problems. In return, they would let US companies dig up their valuable minerals. This deal might look good at first glance, but it could lead America into another messy foreign fight.

We should fix our friendship with Canada instead. They have many of the minerals we need. We can work with the Congolese on business deals and talk to them as friends. We don't need to send soldiers there. This approach keeps us safer and still gets us the minerals.

America needs special rocks and metals for our modern life. We use them in phones, cars, wind turbines, and military gear. Right now, China controls most of these materials. We want to find other places to buy from. This helps us stay strong as a country.

The Congo plan could help us find new places to get these materials. It might also create jobs for local people. When people have steady work, they feel less need to join rebel groups. Local mining jobs could make the area more peaceful over time. The country has plenty to offer.

We don't know much about this deal yet. Reports say Congo wants to give US firms the first pick of its minerals. It also wants help building roads and bridges. The US would train its army and give it weapons. We might even send our troops there. A Congo senator sent this idea to Marco Rubio.

Congo's soil is rich with minerals. It leads the world in cobalt production and mines copper, tantalum, diamonds, and tin. Most of these appear on US critical mineral lists. Cobalt helps make batteries and jet engines, and tantalum is used in computers and medical tools. Congo may also have lithium deposits.

For America, going straight to the source makes sense. We could skip the middlemen and get materials directly. This fits with our plans to focus on processing minerals here at home. We wouldn't need to start new mines in the US; we could just refine what comes from Congo.

Congo wants more trading partners beyond China. Chinese companies already control much of their mining. Adding US buyers would give them more options and better prices. The US also acts more forcefully than China when problems arise. We could help them deal with rebels better than China does.

But Congo faces huge political challenges. It ranks among the poorest and least stable nations worldwide. Just this January, rebels took over Goma, a major city. This rebel group, called M23, gets help from nearby Rwanda. Goma has between 800,000 and 2 million people, but nobody knows exactly how many live there.

Congo has been fighting wars since 1993. Back then, it was called Zaire. A dictator named Mobutu ran the country with US backing. He kept power by turning ethnic groups against each other. As US support decreased, he struggled to control a huge territory. The country has about 40 million people spread across an area as big as Alaska and Texas combined.

East Congo fell into ethnic fighting after the 1994 Rwanda genocide. Millions of Hutu refugees ran into Congo. Some had helped carry out mass killings. They fled as Tutsi forces took control of Rwanda. By 1997, rebels had kicked Mobutu out of power. Laurent Kabila took charge instead. This marked the end of the First Congo War.

But peace didn't last. The Second Congo War started in 1998 and ran until 2003. Angola, Chad, Namibia, and Zimbabwe supported Kabila. Burundi, Rwanda, and Uganda backed his enemies. Many years later, the M23 rebel group was formed from leftover fighters. Rwanda still helps these rebels today. They loot minerals from eastern Congo.

The situation has many layers of complexity. Congo uses five official languages. People there speak over 200 different languages. The country has around 250 ethnic groups. The land may not have mountains like Afghanistan, but dealing with people proves just as hard. Neighboring countries meddle constantly. The central government remains weak.

These problems helped China gain control of Congo minerals. Chinese companies don't mind working in dangerous places. A mine called Kisanfu produces lots of copper and cobalt under Chinese management. An American company used to run it. Freeport-McMoRan sold it to Chinese miners in 2020. They needed cash to pay debts. Chinese companies have government backing and fewer money worries.

A US-Congo mineral deal brings big dangers. Most worrying, American troops could get pulled into a nasty civil war. We've seen this before in Afghanistan and Iraq. Both places became giant traps. We left both countries without clear wins. We lost many lives and spent billions of dollars. Those lessons apply here.

Even if we improved safety with our military, business problems would remain. Western mining companies avoid risky places for good reasons. Higher risk means higher costs. Bribing foreign officials breaks US law. The Trump team paused enforcement of this law for 180 days. But high costs still make mining there hard. Chinese companies flood markets with cheap minerals, making profit margins tiny.

Finally, Congo produces mostly cobalt. We may not need as much cobalt in the future. If Congress repeals clean energy laws, demand will drop. Even with those laws, battery technology keeps changing. Newer batteries use less cobalt or none at all. Lithium iron phosphate batteries cost less and use materials that come from more places. Their popularity grows every day.

America should find more sources for important minerals. We should help African countries use their resources to grow stronger. Both goals matter greatly. But sending our soldiers to one of the most dangerous spots on Earth creates more problems than it solves. We need smarter ways to get what we need.
 

Attachments

  • Congo mineral deal is a risky bet for US security.webp
    Congo mineral deal is a risky bet for US security.webp
    11.6 KB · Views: 18

Trending content

Latest posts

Top