Elephants Protection Society seeks faster Maun compensation

Elephant advocates want payouts fixed fast, saying Maun communities eat the risk while wildlife cash flows elsewhere.

Call for compensation reset

• The Elephants Protection Society demanded a faster elephant-related compensation rollout.
• The focus stayed on communities living around Maun.
• Safety risks from injured or agitated elephants were flagged.
• Farmers and homes were cited as regular collateral damage.

Gaps in current payouts

• Oaitse Nawa said schemes mainly pay after elephant-related deaths.
• Injuries, crop losses, and property damage fall through cracks.
• Residents absorb losses without backup.
• Risk exposure was framed as unfair and unsustainable.

Tourism money versus local risk

• Oaitse Nawa argued elephants drive national tourism revenue.
• Host communities see little protection tied to that value.
• Living near wildlife was described as an unpaid sacrifice.
• Fair compensation was pitched as basic reciprocity.

Coexistence and conservation angle

• Oaitse Nawa linked broader payouts to human-elephant coexistence.
• Livelihood protection was framed as conservation support.
• Local buy-in depends on fair treatment.
• Authorities were urged to move quickly on reform.