Jayaram acts as witness in Sabarimala gold investigation

Jayaram got pulled into the Sabarimala gold mess as a witness, confirming the plates left Kerala while dodging any accusation of personal gain.

Why investigators questioned him

• Jayaram was questioned by the SIT at his Chennai residence.
• Probe focused on missing gold plates linked to Sabarimala.
• Investigators called the step key to tracking diversion.
• Outcome framed him as a witness, not a suspect.

What he admitted

• Jayaram confirmed the gold plates reached his Chennai home.
• Plates were meant to stay at the Sannidhanam.
• Statement backed claims of transport outside Kerala.
• Movement strengthened the prosecution's narrative.

No legal heat on the actor

• SIT stated no action planned against Jayaram.
• Found zero financial links to the accused individuals.
• Ruled out money trails or personal benefit.
• Classified his role as non-commercial.

Connection to the main accused

• Jayaram acknowledged knowing Unnikrishnan Potti for decades.
• Relationship rooted in shared Sabarimala faith.
• Visits to the shrine spanned nearly five decades.
• Trust stemmed from religious familiarity.

Religious reasoning behind actions

• Jayaram said Potti framed rituals as spiritually beneficial.
• Believed poojas on the plates would bring merit.
• Agreed based on faith, not logistics.
• Denied awareness of misuse or fraud.

Why his testimony matters

• Jayaram agreed to depose before the court.
• SIT sees value in mapping plate movement.
• Public rituals outside the temple became central.
• Case leans on his confirmation trail.