The courtroom buzzed with tension as a high-stakes murder trial continued. Forensic expert Derrick Nasawali took the stand, presenting evidence against Molly Katanga in her husband Henry's death. He spoke about a pistol found at the crime scene and gunshot residue tests that might connect Katanga to the shooting.
Nasawali described examining a Zastava Arms pistol and several pieces of evidence from the crime scene. He confirmed the weapon worked and could fire ammunition. The forensic expert told the court about matching cartridge marks and finding gunshot residue on Katanga's clothing and hand. But defense lawyers weren't about to let these claims slide without a fight.
The defense team attacked the credibility of the forensic evidence from every angle. They questioned how the evidence was collected, stored, and analyzed. Lawyer McDosman Kabega grilled Nasawali about the chain of custody for the exhibits. He challenged whether the witness had actually examined the crime scene or just relied on other people's reports.
Medical details became a crucial battleground. The defense pointed out that Katanga had injured fingers, suggesting she might not have been physically able to fire the weapon. They hinted that the single bullet found could indicate suicide rather than murder. Nasawali remained cautious, refusing to draw definitive conclusions about how the death occurred.
Another forensic expert, Dr. Jaffar Kisitu, followed Nasawali to the witness stand. He analyzed gunshot residue but faced immediate challenges from the defense. They demanded to see the exact methods used in the forensic testing. The prosecution pushed back, arguing that revealing full laboratory procedures could compromise national security.
The trial revealed the complex dance of forensic evidence. Each side tried to poke holes in the other's argument. The judge carefully listened to debates about evidence collection, scientific testing, and legal procedures. With more witnesses expected to testify, the case remained far from resolved. The courtroom waited to see how these forensic puzzle pieces might ultimately fit together to reveal the truth about Henry Katanga's death.
Nasawali described examining a Zastava Arms pistol and several pieces of evidence from the crime scene. He confirmed the weapon worked and could fire ammunition. The forensic expert told the court about matching cartridge marks and finding gunshot residue on Katanga's clothing and hand. But defense lawyers weren't about to let these claims slide without a fight.
The defense team attacked the credibility of the forensic evidence from every angle. They questioned how the evidence was collected, stored, and analyzed. Lawyer McDosman Kabega grilled Nasawali about the chain of custody for the exhibits. He challenged whether the witness had actually examined the crime scene or just relied on other people's reports.
Medical details became a crucial battleground. The defense pointed out that Katanga had injured fingers, suggesting she might not have been physically able to fire the weapon. They hinted that the single bullet found could indicate suicide rather than murder. Nasawali remained cautious, refusing to draw definitive conclusions about how the death occurred.
Another forensic expert, Dr. Jaffar Kisitu, followed Nasawali to the witness stand. He analyzed gunshot residue but faced immediate challenges from the defense. They demanded to see the exact methods used in the forensic testing. The prosecution pushed back, arguing that revealing full laboratory procedures could compromise national security.
The trial revealed the complex dance of forensic evidence. Each side tried to poke holes in the other's argument. The judge carefully listened to debates about evidence collection, scientific testing, and legal procedures. With more witnesses expected to testify, the case remained far from resolved. The courtroom waited to see how these forensic puzzle pieces might ultimately fit together to reveal the truth about Henry Katanga's death.
