The Supreme Court finally shut the book on the Kudirat Abiola murder case, saying Lagos State went silent for nine years and does not get to suddenly restart what it abandoned.
How the case officially ended
How the case officially ended
- The Supreme Court ruled that Lagos State let the case die through inaction.
- A unanimous five-justice panel rejected any attempt to revive the prosecution.
- The message was simple: you cannot sleep on a case for nine years and then knock again.
- Procedural steps were required after permission to appeal was granted in 2014.
- Nothing was filed, followed up on, or explained for nearly a decade.
- The court treated the silence as abandonment, not delay.
- The appeal centered on Hamza Al-Mustapha, a retired major.
- He once served as Chief Security Officer to Sani Abacha.
- The charge related to the killing of Kudirat Abiola.
- She was the wife of Moshood Abiola.
- Her assassination happened in Lagos in 1996.
- The killing occurred during nationwide protests over the annulled June 12 election.
- Justice Uwani Aba-Aji delivered the ruling.
- The court emphasized that leave to appeal came with clear deadlines.
- Nine years was described as far beyond reasonable patience.
- Paul Daudu pointed out total noncompliance.
- No notice of appeal was filed within the 30-day window.
- The argument framed Lagos State as uninterested in prosecution.
- Hearing notices were served repeatedly.
- Lagos State neither appeared nor explained its absence.
- The silence continued even after the court noted awareness of proceedings since 2020.
- Appeal SC/CR/45/2014 was dismissed outright.
- A related appeal, SC/CR/6/2014, was also struck out.
- Both fell for the same reason: procedural abandonment.
- In 2014, the court allowed Lagos State to appeal out of time.
- The order came from a panel led by Walter Onnoghen.
- Lagos State was instructed to file within 30 days and did not.
- A Lagos High Court convicted Al-Mustapha, Mohammed Abacha, and Lateef Shofolahan in 2012.
- Death sentences were handed down for conspiracy and murder.
- The Court of Appeal overturned everything in 2013, citing weak evidence.
- Procedure mattered more than emotion at this stage.
- The court treated time and diligence as non-negotiable.
- With this ruling, the case is legally finished.