Public examination evaluators risk two years behind bars when they delegate answer sheet grading to unauthorized individuals. The Dhaka Education Board released this warning while emphasizing that examination papers represent classified materials requiring strict protection. Officials declared that chief examiners and regular evaluators bear sacred responsibility for safeguarding these documents from improper access. The Examination Conduct Act 1980 specifically criminalizes unauthorized evaluation under Section 10, which carries severe penalties upon conviction. Violators face imprisonment terms reaching two years alongside monetary fines, with courts empowered to impose either punishment individually or together.
The Controller of Examinations issued formal guidance directing all evaluation staff to handle grading duties personally rather than transferring responsibilities to others. Educational authorities stressed that maintaining document security represents a fundamental obligation for examination personnel. The board urged evaluators to treat public examination materials with appropriate confidentiality throughout the assessment process.
The Controller of Examinations issued formal guidance directing all evaluation staff to handle grading duties personally rather than transferring responsibilities to others. Educational authorities stressed that maintaining document security represents a fundamental obligation for examination personnel. The board urged evaluators to treat public examination materials with appropriate confidentiality throughout the assessment process.
