A new series in The Lancet, authored by 43 international experts, identifies ultra-processed foods as a critical public health threat requiring immediate global policy action. These scientists, including University of São Paulo Professor Carlos Monteiro, who helped coin the term, state that the widespread consumption of these items is linked to deteriorating diet quality and a higher risk of numerous chronic diseases.
An analysis of 104 long-term studies within the series indicated that 92 found associations between UPF-heavy diets and adverse health outcomes. These included conditions such as Type 2 diabetes, obesity, depression, and certain cancers. The authors acknowledge that more research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind these health effects. They argue, however, that the existing evidence is sufficiently strong to justify governmental intervention.
The papers propose integrating UPFs into existing policies targeting foods high in fat, sugar, and salt. The authors identify the UPF industry itself as the primary obstacle to reform. In response, the International Food and Beverage Alliance stated that its members are committed to improving global diets and that food companies should be included in policy discussions, warning that the series' recommendations exceed the available evidence.
An analysis of 104 long-term studies within the series indicated that 92 found associations between UPF-heavy diets and adverse health outcomes. These included conditions such as Type 2 diabetes, obesity, depression, and certain cancers. The authors acknowledge that more research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind these health effects. They argue, however, that the existing evidence is sufficiently strong to justify governmental intervention.
The papers propose integrating UPFs into existing policies targeting foods high in fat, sugar, and salt. The authors identify the UPF industry itself as the primary obstacle to reform. In response, the International Food and Beverage Alliance stated that its members are committed to improving global diets and that food companies should be included in policy discussions, warning that the series' recommendations exceed the available evidence.