Kenya's Director of Public Prosecutions justified terrorism charges against demonstrators following incidents on June 25 and July 7, 2025. The office recognizes public debate surrounding these prosecutions while supporting press freedom and civil society participation in democratic accountability. Prosecutors argue the charges reflect legal standards and security concerns rather than attempts to silence political opposition.
Investigation findings suggest coordinated attacks on government buildings, judicial facilities, police stations, and state employees exceeded spontaneous protest boundaries. Officials characterize these actions as deliberate violence designed to paralyze essential services, spread public fear, and undermine institutional confidence. Chief Justice Martha Koome labeled the Kikuyu Law Courts arson as terrorism after examining the damaged facility. Legal provisions under the Prevention of Terrorism Act apply when activities aim to disrupt critical operations or intimidate citizens through systematic destruction. The prosecution office acknowledges public apprehension about potential legislative misuse while emphasizing evidence-based charges and constitutional rights protection for all defendants.
Investigation findings suggest coordinated attacks on government buildings, judicial facilities, police stations, and state employees exceeded spontaneous protest boundaries. Officials characterize these actions as deliberate violence designed to paralyze essential services, spread public fear, and undermine institutional confidence. Chief Justice Martha Koome labeled the Kikuyu Law Courts arson as terrorism after examining the damaged facility. Legal provisions under the Prevention of Terrorism Act apply when activities aim to disrupt critical operations or intimidate citizens through systematic destruction. The prosecution office acknowledges public apprehension about potential legislative misuse while emphasizing evidence-based charges and constitutional rights protection for all defendants.
