The recent controversy around Larian Studios extends beyond their use of generative AI. Industry writers are now criticizing the developer for what they call exploitative hiring practices. Several narrative designers have shared stories of being asked to complete lengthy, unpaid writing tests during the recruitment process.
Writer Zoë Quinn stated they turned down a recruitment opportunity from Larian due to a demand for an unpaid, playable test and a strict on-site work policy. Others, like Bruno Dias, called the studio's hiring process an open secret, describing months of interviews and excessive unpaid work demands. Julie Muncy and Cat Manning suggested a connection between these practices and the studio's embrace of AI tools.
Many writers expressed hesitation about speaking out earlier, citing a tight job market and not wanting to harm colleagues at the studio. The backlash over AI usage provided an opening for these accumulated grievances to surface publicly. So far, only Daniel Vávra from Warhorse Studios has publicly defended Larian's position on AI. The situation has notably tarnished the studio's previously sterling reputation within the narrative community.
Writer Zoë Quinn stated they turned down a recruitment opportunity from Larian due to a demand for an unpaid, playable test and a strict on-site work policy. Others, like Bruno Dias, called the studio's hiring process an open secret, describing months of interviews and excessive unpaid work demands. Julie Muncy and Cat Manning suggested a connection between these practices and the studio's embrace of AI tools.
Many writers expressed hesitation about speaking out earlier, citing a tight job market and not wanting to harm colleagues at the studio. The backlash over AI usage provided an opening for these accumulated grievances to surface publicly. So far, only Daniel Vávra from Warhorse Studios has publicly defended Larian's position on AI. The situation has notably tarnished the studio's previously sterling reputation within the narrative community.
