P
Phoenix
guest
How much of a game-changer will generative AI be in transforming the creative industry, especially when it comes to digital art?
Honestly artificial intelligence generators have affected so many artists it's insane and it's only going to get better.
Methinks artists are making a huge, gigantic mistake going after AI in a way that will hurt them. And by fighting for this silly "opt-out" battle, you are just digging your own grave. In case you'll succeed, AI companies will be able to claim that AI-generated art is 100% legal, hence a "fair" competitor. At the same time, you won't protect anything, because AI software allows users to train their datasets, at home, using whatever they want. So you'll have unfair competition that will crush you, and your work won't be protected anyway.
What's a solution to that?
What we have to do, instead, is a proposal to have every output generated by an artificial intelligence generator tool be public domain and copyright free. In this way, you won't have an unfair competitor. This goes not only for AI-generated art but for AI-generated everything. Since the source was public and collected for free, the output must be public and released for free.
There is a reason why human artists are fed up with all these generative AI models. It's because AI bros are trying to force AI on them and stealing from other human artists.
What we have to do, instead, is a proposal to have every output generated by an artificial intelligence generator tool be public domain and copyright free. In this way, you won't have an unfair competitor. This goes not only for AI-generated art but for AI-generated everything. Since the source was public and collected for free, the output must be public and released for free.
Gimme a break! Avatar, Transformers, Jurassic Park used AI.
There is a reason why human artists are fed up with all these generative AI models. It's because AI bros are trying to force AI on them and stealing from other human artists.